In the wake of a deadly shooting at a rural Georgia high school, threats of violence against schools have increased across the country. Incidents involving children making threats have led to arrests, school closures, and increased police presence. The risk of overreacting or underreacting to these threats highlights the need for a standardized and thorough investigation process.
Despite the surge in student arrests following high-profile school shootings, experts warn that many threats may not be serious. Arresting children for non-serious threats can have long-term consequences, potentially turning them into habitual offenders. The discretion of individuals conducting initial investigations can determine whether a threat leads to an arrest or closure of the case.
The lack of a standardized national reporting system for school shooting threats hinders the ability to connect information and prevent potential violence. Current efforts to combat false reporting, or swatting, further complicate the issue. While some states have laws against swatting, the prevalence of false reports can hinder efforts to identify real threats.
Formal behavioral threat assessment approaches have been shown to be effective in preventing unnecessary arrests and ensuring the safety of schools. Guidelines for threat assessment, if followed correctly, can lead to a minimal number of arrests in response to threats. However, only a few states have formal threat assessment protocols in place, highlighting the need for a more comprehensive and standardized approach to address school shooting threats.
Photo credit
www.usatoday.com
