The Texas Court of Appeals has rejected a bid to delay the execution of Robert Roberson, who was convicted of a double murder in 2002. The decision comes after Roberson’s legal team filed a motion to postpone his execution, citing concerns about the validity of his conviction.
Roberson was sentenced to death for the killing of his ex-girlfriend and her young son in 2002. His lawyers argued that new evidence has emerged that could prove his innocence, including unreliable witness testimony and mishandling of evidence in the original trial.
The Court of Appeals, however, dismissed these claims and denied Roberson’s request for a stay of execution. They maintained that the evidence presented by his legal team was insufficient to warrant a delay in the execution.
Roberson’s case has garnered attention from advocates who oppose the death penalty, as well as those who question the reliability of eyewitness testimony in criminal trials. His legal team has vowed to continue fighting for a stay of execution and to explore all possible avenues for appeal.
The state of Texas has faced criticism in recent years for its high rate of executions and for cases in which individuals were later found to be wrongfully convicted. Despite these concerns, the Court of Appeals has decided to proceed with Roberson’s execution as scheduled.
As the date of Roberson’s execution approaches, supporters and opponents of the death penalty are closely watching the case unfold. The decision by the Court of Appeals has raised questions about the justice system and the use of capital punishment in Texas.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com